[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071018145238.GA5565@lixom.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:52:38 -0500
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [bug] ata subsystem related crash with latest -git
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 06:42:46AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 18 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> That should work as well. WRT ata_sg_is_last(), if we go ahead with my
>>>> recent sg chaining updates, we can keep the test as it would be a single
>>>> conditional and not require any looping.
>>>> Let me know when you have tested this!
>>> The patch I attached to the last email got both sata_mv test boxes
>>> working reliably (so far).
>>>
>>> I worked up a patch that kills ata_sg_is_last() (plus the
>>> max_phys_segments sata_mv fix), see attached. I'm thinking this is what
>>> I like to see in upstream.
>> Great!
>>> Of course, this doesn't explain why ata_sg_is_last() was broken, but
>>> since it's working _and_ slightly more efficient, I don't really care :)
>> Tomo and I agreed to kill sg_last() a few days ago anyways, so this is
>> perfectly fine with me.
>
> Yep, the [attached] patch that kills ata_sg_is_last() is working here on
> both machines that were previously croaking.
>
> It would be nice to get pdc_adma, sata_sil24 and ipr it-works test done,
> but IMO the patch is pretty straightforward and should be OK.
Tested-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Looks ok on SATA_SIL24 and SATA_MV here on PPC (together with Jens' latest
patch). Both barfed before.
Thanks!
-Olof
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists