[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071017.181907.63126798.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, tomof@....org
Subject: Re: [bug] ata subsystem related crash with latest -git
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
> sg_next() - as it stands now - never actually looks at the SG that its
> argument points to: it explicitly *only* looks at the next one.
>
> That's the bug. If sg_next() looked at the actual *current* sg entry, we
> wouldn't have any issues to begin with, and that's what I'm arguing we
> should do in the longer run (where "longer run" is defined as "when Jens
> does it asap").
What the thing really wants is some kind of indication of state,
without having to bloat up the scatterlist structure.
I believe that we have enough of a limited set of accessors to
sg->page that we can more aggressively encode things in the lower
bits.
I'm thinking of encoding the low two bits of sg->page as
follows:
1) bits == 0
then the SG list is linear and sg_next() is sg++
2) bits == 1
the nest SG is an indirect chunk, sg_next() is
therefore something like:
next = *((struct scatterlist **)(sg + 1));
3) bits == 2
this is the last entry in the scatterlist, sg_next() is NULL
So for the cases of ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN not being set (ie. back
compatible), we can do no bit encoding in page->flags and just do
sg_next() == sg++, as is done now.
When doing SG chaining, in each non-linear chunk we have to allocate
one more pointer past the end of the scatterlist array (instead of a
full extra scatterlist entry for the indirect pointer encode). Next,
all sg->page accesses have to be guarded to clear the state bits
out first.
I don't know, maybe it would work, and would make the loop termination
issues easier to handle properly.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists