linux-kernel - Re: latest checkpatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071018194304.GD21136@shadowen.org>
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:43:04 +0100
From:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: latest checkpatch

On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 08:25:21PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 01:13:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > latest checkpatch.pl works really well on sched.c.
> > 
> > there's only one problem left, this bogus false positive warning 
> > reappeared:
> > 
> >   WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
> >   #5710: FILE: sched.c:5710:
> >   +       if (parent->groups == parent->groups->next) {
> >   +               pflags &= ~(SD_LOAD_BALANCE |
> >   +                               SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE |
> >   +                               SD_BALANCE_FORK |
> >   +                               SD_BALANCE_EXEC |
> >   +                               SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER |
> >   +                               SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES);
> >   +       }
> > 
> > (there's another place in sched.c that trips this up too.)

Ok, checkpatch.pl-next should now no longer trip up on this statement.

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/