[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4717C43D.6030204@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:38:21 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@...ck.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, riel@...hat.com, drepper@...hat.com
Subject: Re: OOM notifications
On 10/18/2007 10:25 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> AIX contains the SIGDANGER signal to notify applications to free up some
> unused cached memory:
>
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0007.0/0901.html
>
> There have been a few discussions on implementing such an idea on Linux,
> but nothing concrete has been achieved.
>
> On the kernel side Rik suggested two notification points: "about to
> swap" (for desktop scenarios) and "about to OOM" (for embedded-like
> scenarios).
>
> With that assumption in mind it would be necessary to either have two
> special devices for notification, or somehow indicate both events
> through the same file descriptor.
>
> Comments are more than welcome.
Given the desktop/embedded distinction you made, do you need both scenarios
active at the same time? If not, it seems something like a
echo -n <level> >/proc/sys/vm/danger
could do with just one sigdanger notification point? (with <level> suitably
defined as or in terms of the used threshold value).
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists