[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071019074706.GA10446@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:47:06 +0100
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/21] KGDB: Request to merge KGDB
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 05:00:50PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:54:29PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > What would be good is if some effort could be made by the utrace-
> > interested parties to make the transition to utrace much less painful.
> > For instance, I quite like the getregs/setregs abstractions, and it
> > looks like these *could* be self-contained in a single patch. It
> > would be nice if we could move architectures over to this one a time.
> > Once that's in, that's one chunk of utrace merged.
>
> Alexey Dobriyan had some patches to implement regsets, and these were
> posted here on lkml.
Given that not all architecture maintainers read lkml, and they are
patches affecting all *architectures*, wouldn't it have been a good
idea if they'd copied linux-arch?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists