linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ia64 vDSO vs --build-id

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200710191128.08252.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:28:07 +0100
From:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	tony.luck@...el.com, Doug Chapman <dchapman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64 vDSO vs --build-id

On Thursday 18 October 2007 23:11, Roland McGrath wrote:
> When gcc uses --build-id by default, the gate.lds.S linker script runs afoul
> of the new note section and produces a bad DSO image.  This fixes it.

I wonder why we bother having --build-id.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/