[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071019120559.GA8708@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:05:59 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86: fix global_flush_tlb() bug
Thanks for catching.
> why this bug never become prominent is a mystery - it can probably be
> explained with the (still) relative obscurity of the x86_64 architecture.
global_flush_tlb() is not very common in the big scheme of things. In a normal
system it only happens single threaded during X server startup and when
the system starts.
So while it's nasty it's unlikely to really hit people in practice.
BTW while looking I noticed this code in the vermilion driver is also
surely not correct:
/*
* Change caching policy of the linear kernel map to avoid
* mapping type conflicts with user-space mappings.
* The first global_flush_tlb() is really only there to do a global
* wbinvd().
*/
global_flush_tlb();
That is not what gft is guaranteed to do.
It would be probably best to just do away with g_f_t() and fold it directly into
c_p_a(). I've seen little evidence the delayed flush optimization ever made
much difference and it seems to be misused and a source of bugs. And near all
legitimate users seem to always call it directly after c_p_a() anyways.
Besides it is grossly misnamed -- it does much more than flushing TLBs.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists