linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0710191345020.13279@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:57:33 +0100 (BST)
From:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
cc:	Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Jarek Poplawski wrote:

> But then... your patch seems to make it possible, because it enables
> irq to the initial state of the counter. Of course, this could happen
> on closing only.

 That's because free_irq() does not disable the interrupt in the correct 
manner.  The scenario is more or less like this:

phy_interrupt()				[depth == 0]
	disable_irq()
		depth++; status |= IRQ_DISABLED;
...
free_irq()				[depth == 1]
	status |= IRQ_DISABLED;
...
phy_change()				[depth == 1]
	enable_irq()
		depth--; status &= ~IRQ_DISABLED;
		oops!

Now if free_irq() correctly incremented the depth counter, then the last
enable_irq() would still decrement it, but with its initial value of 2 it 
would not change the status to reenable the line.

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/