[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4718F5BB.5010301@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:21:47 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] irq-remove: core
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> writes:
>
>> commit 008b5fcf3c1d8456005de26ddd4256b1369225e8
>> Author: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
>> Date: Fri Oct 19 00:45:51 2007 -0400
>>
>> [IRQ ARG REMOVAL] core interrupt delivery infrastructure updates
>>
>> include/asm-generic/irq_regs.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/interrupt.h | 4 ++--
>> kernel/irq/handle.c | 5 +++--
>> kernel/irq/manage.c | 4 ++--
>> kernel/irq/spurious.c | 3 ++-
>> lib/irq_regs.c | 5 +++++
>> 6 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> 008b5fcf3c1d8456005de26ddd4256b1369225e8
>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/irq_regs.h b/include/asm-generic/irq_regs.h
>> index 5ae1d07..1d99ef4 100644
>> --- a/include/asm-generic/irq_regs.h
>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/irq_regs.h
>> @@ -34,4 +34,29 @@ static inline struct pt_regs *set_irq_regs(struct pt_regs
>> *new_regs)
>> return old_regs;
>> }
>>
>> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, __irqfunc_irqs);
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned int get_irqfunc_irq(void)
>> +{
>> + return __get_cpu_var(__irqfunc_irqs);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#if 0
>> +static inline unsigned int set_irqfunc_irq(unsigned int new_irq)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int old_irq, *pirq = &__get_cpu_var(__irqfunc_irqs);
>> +
>> + old_irq = *pirq;
>> + *pirq = new_irq;
>> + return old_irq;
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static inline void set_irqfunc_irq(unsigned int new_irq)
>> +{
>> + int *pirq = &__get_cpu_var(__irqfunc_irqs);
>> +
>> + *pirq = new_irq;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> Please look at handle_IRQ_event. Local irqs are enabled so irq
> recursion can happen. So not handling old_irq is a big nasty
> bug.
Do you think set_irqfunc_irq() should be called at all the callsites of
set_irq_regs(), or one the fix you mention is applied, do you think
current model is sufficient?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists