linux-kernel - Re: [Git pull] arch/x86 updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710191459340.26902@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [Git pull] arch/x86 updates



On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> Pavel Emelyanov (1):
>       i386: consolidate show_regs and show_registers for i386

While I think this is good otherwise, why does it do

	printk(".. comm: %.*s .."
		TASK_COMM_LEN, current->comm,

instead of just using "%s" and "current->comm"? I only noticed because 
there was an unrelated conflict around that thing.

That "current->comm" had better be NUL-terminated already, we use it as 
such all over the place. And if it's not, *that* should be fixed.

I'm editing it back to the simpler pure string.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/