[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710201823.07791.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:23:07 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Philip Langdale <philipl@...rt.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compat_ioctl: introduce generic_compat_ioctl helper
On Saturday 20 October 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> At least for the unlocked_ioctl case this is not nessecary because
> the driver an simply set both the unlocked_ioctl and compat_ioctl
> handlers to the same function. For the drivers not using unlocked_ioctl
> yet a function like this makes sense in theory, but I'd prefer to
> just switch them to ->unlocked_ioctl.
>
There is still the problem with s390 compat_ptr() conversion, a driver
using the same handler for both may interpret a pointer with the high
bit set as out of range.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists