linux-kernel - Re: [GIT] NFS client fixes for 2.6.23++

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710191929340.3794@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
cc:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT] NFS client fixes for 2.6.23++ 



On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Erez Zadok wrote:
> 
> Trond, with Linus's latest tree, you need to #include <linux/sched.h> in
> fs/nfs/unlink.c, else I get:
> 
>   CC [M]  fs/nfs/unlink.o
> fs/nfs/unlink.c: In function 'nfs_dec_sillycount':
> fs/nfs/unlink.c:67: error: 'TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE' undeclared (first use in this function)
...

Hmm? Which architecture?

That said, I do think that there is a distinct lack of proper includes in 
that file. It seems to depend on getting much of the includes indirectly 
from <linux/nfs_fs.h> and friends. And with different architectures having 
different header files..

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/