linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2.6.23-git] toplevel Makefile/depmod bugfix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:44:46 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.23-git] toplevel Makefile/depmod bugfix

 > Accoding to man bash "==" is used to test for equality and "=" is used for assignmnet.
 > I assume the above is a dash syntax error (dash is default on ubuntu IIRC).

My bash man page says the following under "CONDITIONAL EXPRESSIONS":

       string1 == string2
              True if the strings are equal.  = may be used in place
              of == for strict POSIX compliance.

This is bash 3.1 as packaged by Debian.

So I think "=" is the correct thing to use for compatibility with dash
or other non-bash shells, since as far as I know, there are no
situations where a comparison with "=" will fail but "==" will succed.
(ie "=" is strictly more compatible).

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/