[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710201310050.1997@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:10:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
cc: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-net@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
On Oct 20 2007 00:47, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
>> Sure, the idea was to mark the filter table obsolete as to make people start
>> using the mangle table to do their filtering for new setups. The filter
>> table would then still be available for legacy/special setups. But this
>> would only be possible if we at least ported the REJECT target to mangle.
>
>That's *half* the battle. The other half is explaining why I should move
>from a perfectly functional setup that uses the filter table. What gains
>do I get from doing so? What isn't working that I don't know about? etc?
>
>In other words - why do I want to move from filter to mangle?
Packet processing time.
Compare previous:
packet goes through mangle, then is dropped in filter
Compare afterwards:
packet is already dropped in mangle
=> less code to run through
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists