linux-kernel - Re: tristate and bool not enogh for Kconfig anymore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:03:13 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	Henrik Carlqvist <hc1@...lhem.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tristate and bool not enogh for Kconfig anymore

On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:45:17AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Is there any other way to specify that a functionality can only be built
> > as a module, not built into the kernel?
> 
> config FOO
> 	depends on BAR && m
> 
> restricts FOO to module-only.
> 
> > In my firsta attempts to post about these tests my post ended up not on
> > the mailing list but as a reply to Sam Ravnborg only, apologies for
> > that...

This is obviously the right solution.
Randy - we should document this somewhere together with more kconfig tips'n'tricks.

A new document or do we extend kconfig-language?

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/