[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071022124551.GA7438@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:45:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Paolo Giarrusso <p.giarrusso@...il.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in
2.6.23-final.
* Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> in kernel/sched.c
>
> FWIW, I would simply kill the damn fastcall thing - right now the only
> user is uml/i386; everything else either has it #defined to nothing or
> (as i386 does) passes -mregparm=3 while having fastcall expand to
> __attribute__((regparm(3))) - i.e. has all functions fastcall.
>
> Do we really need it on uml/i386 enough to keep bothering with that
> mess?
we should kill it there too.
the only place where we should _please_ keep those annotations are for
functions that get called from assembly code. This makes life immensely
easier for -pg (CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACING) kernels.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists