[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071022001515.GW995458@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:15:15 +1000
From: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] block: Isolate the buffer cache in it's own mappings.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 02:24:46PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Saturday 20 October 2007 07:27, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Currently only
> > metadata is more or less in sync with the contents of /dev/hda1.
>
> It either is or it isn't, right? And it is, isn't it? (at least
> for the common filesystems).
It is not true for XFS - it's metadata is not in sync with /dev/<block>
at all as all the cached metadata is kept in a different address space
to the raw block device.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists