[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071022152912.GA841@linux-mips.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:29:12 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irq_flags_t: intro and core annotations
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 01:30:42PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> irq_flags_t
>
> New type for use with spin_lock_irqsave() and friends.
Talking about it, why did we ever require this to be a long anyway? I could
get away with a single bit for MIPS; the rest of this variable is pure
bloat. An abstract datatype could help finally fix this.
Ralf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists