linux-kernel - Re: LSM conversion to static interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071022165621.GC29876@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:56:21 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Crispin Cowan <crispin@...spincowan.com>,
	Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@...oo.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	LSM ML <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: LSM conversion to static interface

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:50:43PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> For that reason I think keeping LSM is the right thing to do.

Wait, we aren't talking about dropping LSM at all, just the "LSM is a
module" option.  That's it.  And by making LSM not a module, we can then
go on to fix some of the reported speed issues that are present with the
LSM option enabled right now.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/