[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <471CEDFD.3030603@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:37:49 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
CC: dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
xfs@....sgi.com, Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@...cam.ac.uk>,
Morten Bøgeskov
<xen-users@...ten.bogeskov.dk>, xfs-masters@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
Nick Piggin wrote:
> You could call it a bug I think. I don't know much about Xen though,
> whether or not it expects to be able to run an arbitrary OS kernel.
>
Xen's paravirtualized mode always requires a guest OS to be modified;
certainly some operating systems would be very hard to make work with
Xen. But you can always fall back to using shadow pagetables or full
hvm (VT/SVM) mode.
> Presumably, the hypervisor _could_ write protect and trap writes to
> *all* page table page mappings.
>
Xen manages this stuff with refcounts; it doesn't maintain an rmap for
these pages, so it would have to exhaustively search to do this. But
aside from that, Xen never actively modifies pagetables, so this would
be a new behaviour in the interface.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists