linux-kernel - Re: request_firmware() and in-kernel modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <471D1DC8.5090802@freescale.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:01:44 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: request_firmware() and in-kernel modules

Greg KH wrote:

> I'd recommend using the non-blocking mode, that way, when userspace
> finally gets running, it can handle the firmware events properly, and
> your kernel code will have not timed out already.

Thanks Greg, that did the trick.

What the value of FW_ACTION_NOHOTPLUG?  If I specify that instead of 
FW_ACTION_HOTPLUG, I presume I don't get automatic loading of the firwmare via 
the hotplug subsystem, but request_firmware() still times out.  Why would I ever 
not want to take advantage of hotplug?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/