linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c0942db0710221600j24f76f68lefe562cc8bc2d067@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:00:16 -0700
From:	"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To:	"Rene Herman" <rene.herman@...access.nl>
Cc:	"Roel Kluin" <12o3l@...cali.nl>, "Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug

On 10/22/07, Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> wrote:
> Hugely trust inspiring isn't it -- the amount of eyes and comments you'll
> get even on trivial patches like this? This development model is working!

Go easy with the snarkiness, hmm? It's the trivial ones that seem to
be the most dangerous. The larger ones actually get *tested*
sometimes.

> Now if only we'd sometimes get some for non trivial patches as well...

That's certainly true regardless, but for myself, I'd rather throw
some reviews out for the small ones since I have adequate time and
knowledge for them. The larger ones require domain specific knowledge
I lack, and time I don't have.

~r.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/