[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071022065202.GI2998@hacking>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:52:02 +0800
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
Cc: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Paolo Giarrusso <p.giarrusso@...il.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in
2.6.23-final.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:42:33AM +0100, Nix wrote:
>On 22 Oct 2007, WANG Cong uttered the following:
>> I build UML for non-SMP x86. But I don't know about UML_NET_VDE. ;(
>>
>> Errors threw out by gcc (too many) are put here:
>> http://wangcong.org/down/errors.txt
>
>It's hard to tell without LOCALE=C, but those are the sorts of results
>I'd expect if you had run make {old,menu,x}config without specifying
>ARCH=um, so you've configured for one architecture and are now trying
>to build another.
>
>Where is the include/asm symlink pointing to in your build tree?
$ ls -l include/asm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 wangcong wangcong 6 2007-10-22 12:34 include/asm -> asm-um
OK. Let me do the following:
$ make mrproper
...
$ make defconfig ARCH=um
...
#
# configuration written to .config
#
$ make ARCH=um
(Still tons of errors here...)
Am I wrong or I missed something?
Regards.
--
May the Source Be With You.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists