linux-kernel - Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071022074823.GJ2998@hacking>
Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:48:23 +0800
From:	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	Paolo Giarrusso <p.giarrusso@...il.com>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in
	2.6.23-final.

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:43AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:52:02PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:42:33AM +0100, Nix wrote:
>> >On 22 Oct 2007, WANG Cong uttered the following:
>> >> I build UML for non-SMP x86. But I don't know about UML_NET_VDE. ;(
>> >>
>> >> Errors threw out by gcc (too many) are put here:
>> >> 	http://wangcong.org/down/errors.txt
>> >
>> >It's hard to tell without LOCALE=C, but those are the sorts of results
>> >I'd expect if you had run make {old,menu,x}config without specifying
>> >ARCH=um, so you've configured for one architecture and are now trying
>> >to build another.
>> >
>> >Where is the include/asm symlink pointing to in your build tree?
>> 
>> $ ls -l include/asm
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 wangcong wangcong 6 2007-10-22 12:34 include/asm -> asm-um
>> 
>> OK. Let me do the following:
>> 
>> 	$ make mrproper
>
>Please try
>make ARCH=um mrproper
>
>this will clean up the additional uml symlinks.
>

Hi, Sam, Al and others.

I just followed what Sam told me, errors are much fewer this time,
but still exist. Error messages are:

  CC      arch/um/kernel/syscall.o
  CC      arch/um/kernel/sysrq.o
arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c: In function ‘show_stack’:
arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c:63: error: ‘UESP’ undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c:63: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c:63: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [arch/um/kernel/sysrq.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/um/kernel] Error 2

Or I missed something again?

And I use `make defconfig ARCH=um' to generate .config, my tree
is 2.6.23-git16 (Al, is this OK?).

Thanks.

-- 
May the Source Be With You.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/