[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830710222309j599d0e38xa7c4bdf7c160019a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:09:29 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Srivatsa Vaddagiri" <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
On 10/22/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I think we also need the notion of load, like we have in cpu_acct.c
Yes, a notion of load would be good - but the "load" calculated by
cpu_acct.c isn't all that useful yet - it's just a total of the CPU
cycles used in the 10 second time interval prior to the current
interval. Something that's more analagous to the real machine load
would be nice, and I hope the numbers could be made available via CFS.
> Don't we need to do a css_get() on the cgrp to ensure that the cgroup
> does not go away if it's empty and someone does an rmdir on it?
See my other email. Yes, I think we need more here, but probably
something more generic.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists