[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710231113480.16684@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:14:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@...oo.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
On Oct 23 2007 02:13, Chris Wright wrote:
>* Jan Engelhardt (jengelh@...putergmbh.de) wrote:
>> On Oct 22 2007 22:16, Chris Wright wrote:
>> >Yes, and I think we can still improve performance although I can't see
>> >anyway to help out the modular case, so I guess it will have to incur
>> >the hit that's always been there. I think your Kconfig option is a
>> >decent compromise.
>>
>> (Un)registering security modules is a one-time hit. You do not load
>> and unload modules on a per-minute basis outside debugging.
>
>I'm referring to the hit for indirect calls
Indeed, I just seen that. Not too nice :(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists