[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071023092127.GB1847@ff.dom.local>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:21:27 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: "Maciej W\. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:02:59PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
...
> If this work doesn't rearm itself - yes. (otherwise, the same ->func
> can run twice _at the same time_)
>
> But again, in this case wait_on_work() after try_to_grab_pending() == 1
> doesn't block, so we can just do
>
> if (cancel_work_sync(w))
> w->func();
>
...but, if it were run just before work_clear_pending()?
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists