[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071023103351.GA2795@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:33:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
* Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> It's all about the end goal - having maintainable and resilient code.
> And I think the sg code will be better once we get past the next day
> or so, and it'll be more robust. That is what matters to me, not the
> simplicity of the patch itself.
Linus' latest tree, which has your SG-list enhancements included,
certainly works fine here and does not have the problems of the first
iteration.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists