[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071023105615.GI5059@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:56:15 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
On Tue, Oct 23 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > It's all about the end goal - having maintainable and resilient code.
> > And I think the sg code will be better once we get past the next day
> > or so, and it'll be more robust. That is what matters to me, not the
> > simplicity of the patch itself.
>
> Linus' latest tree, which has your SG-list enhancements included,
> certainly works fine here and does not have the problems of the first
> iteration.
That's good to hear :-)
I have a series of pending patches where I've collected fallout patches
from people and some from myself here:
http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=shortlog;h=sg
or pullable from
git://git.kernel.dk/inux-2.6-block.git sg
As far as I can tell, all archs should now compile and work. I've tested
(compile tested) alpha/arm/ia64/m68k/mips/sh/sparc this morning and
fixed whatever showed up. It's all just a missing linux/scatterlist.h
include or ->page usage.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists