[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071023115709.GA1734@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:57:09 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: mark irqbalance not-recommended
Mark CONFIG_IRQBALANCE as not recommended any more. It eats too much
power, and better solutions are available in userspace.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
---
commit 2665f7971b5b97830b028308553a78a95c131988
tree e1782cceebfb5900373469c0043d113de88f861f
parent f5085f6ea1c5771708c44a4a42ee217e760ff4a0
author Pavel <pavel@....ucw.cz> Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:56:15 +0200
committer Pavel <pavel@....ucw.cz> Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:56:15 +0200
arch/i386/Kconfig | 9 ++++++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/i386/Kconfig b/arch/i386/Kconfig
index eba2d88..10f3c38 100644
--- a/arch/i386/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig
@@ -779,10 +779,13 @@ config EFI
config IRQBALANCE
bool "Enable kernel irq balancing"
depends on SMP && X86_IO_APIC
- default y
+ default n
help
- The default yes will allow the kernel to do irq load balancing.
- Saying no will keep the kernel from doing irq load balancing.
+ Saying yes will allow the kernel to do irq load balancing;
+ but it generates too many CPU wakeups, eating power, and
+ is better done in userspace.
+
+ Say N.
# turning this on wastes a bunch of space.
# Summit needs it only when NUMA is on
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists