linux-kernel - [RFC/PATCH 7/5] rt: PI-workqueue: propagate prio for delayed work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:22:26 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 7/5] rt: PI-workqueue: propagate prio for delayed work

Subject: rt: PI-workqueue: propagate prio for delayed work

Delayed work looses its enqueue priority, and will be enqueued on the prio
of the softirq thread. Ammend this.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
 include/linux/workqueue.h |    1 +
 kernel/workqueue.c        |   16 ++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/workqueue.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct work_struct {
 struct delayed_work {
 	struct work_struct work;
 	struct timer_list timer;
+	int prio;
 };
 
 struct execute_work {
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/workqueue.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -149,12 +149,12 @@ static void insert_work(struct cpu_workq
 
 /* Preempt must be disabled. */
 static void __queue_work(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
-			 struct work_struct *work)
+			 struct work_struct *work, int prio)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&cwq->lock, flags);
-	insert_work(cwq, work, current->normal_prio, current->normal_prio);
+	insert_work(cwq, work, prio, prio);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cwq->lock, flags);
 }
 
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ int fastcall queue_work(struct workqueue
 
 	if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work))) {
 		BUG_ON(!plist_node_empty(&work->entry));
-		__queue_work(wq_per_cpu(wq, cpu), work);
+		__queue_work(wq_per_cpu(wq, cpu), work, current->normal_prio);
 		ret = 1;
 	}
 	return ret;
@@ -189,7 +189,8 @@ void delayed_work_timer_fn(unsigned long
 	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_wq_data(&dwork->work);
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq = cwq->wq;
 
-	__queue_work(wq_per_cpu(wq, raw_smp_processor_id()), &dwork->work);
+	__queue_work(wq_per_cpu(wq, raw_smp_processor_id()),
+			&dwork->work, dwork->prio);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -232,6 +233,7 @@ int queue_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struc
 		BUG_ON(!plist_node_empty(&work->entry));
 
 		/* This stores cwq for the moment, for the timer_fn */
+		dwork->prio = current->normal_prio;
 		set_wq_data(work, wq_per_cpu(wq, raw_smp_processor_id()));
 		timer->expires = jiffies + delay;
 		timer->data = (unsigned long)dwork;
@@ -702,7 +704,8 @@ int schedule_on_each_cpu(void (*func)(vo
 		work->info = info;
 		INIT_WORK(&work->work, schedule_on_each_cpu_func);
 		set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(&work->work));
-		__queue_work(per_cpu_ptr(keventd_wq->cpu_wq, cpu), &work->work);
+		__queue_work(per_cpu_ptr(keventd_wq->cpu_wq, cpu),
+				&work->work, current->normal_prio);
 	}
 	unlock_cpu_hotplug();
 
@@ -749,7 +752,8 @@ int schedule_on_each_cpu_wq(struct workq
 
 		INIT_WORK(work, func);
 		set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work));
-		__queue_work(per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, cpu), work);
+		__queue_work(per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, cpu), work,
+				current->normal_prio);
 	}
 	flush_workqueue(wq);
 	free_percpu(works);


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/