[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071023.144857.03983847.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jeff@...zik.org
Cc: auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com, ajax@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add eeprom_bad_csum_allow module option to e1000.
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:40:01 -0400
> Sorry, I disagree. Just as with e100, if there is a clear way the user
> can recover their setup -- and Adam says his was effective -- I don't
> see why we should be denying users the ability to use their own hardware.
I'd like to second these sentiments.
Just because you can come up with cases where using a wrong
eeprom would fail, does not mean the facility should not be
provided at all.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists