[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0710231450450.31564@us.intercode.com.au>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:56:52 +1000 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@...oo.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> @@ -4895,6 +4908,7 @@ static struct security_operations selinu
> .sem_semop = selinux_sem_semop,
>
> .register_security = selinux_register_security,
> + .unregister_security = selinux_unregister_security,
>
> .d_instantiate = selinux_d_instantiate,
You also need to consider whether to allow capabilities to be built as an
unloadable module. If not, then we don't need this hook added back into
SELinux. Otherwise, if it is desired, you also need to reinstate
capability_exit and general modular bits for security/capability.c.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists