linux-kernel - Re: LSM conversion to static interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710222230250.15763@asgard.lang.hm>
Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:	david@...g.hm
To:	Crispin Cowan <crispin@...spincowan.com>
cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@...oo.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LSM ML <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LSM conversion to static interface

On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Crispin Cowan wrote:

>
> Suffice it to say that there are a variety of reasons why someone either
> cannot re-compile a kernel, or just does not want to recompile a kernel.
> This change to LSM removes their choice to use modules others than those
> provided by their distro vendor.
>
one reason to not be willing to rebuild the kernel is that they may rely 
on a module from a different third party that is shipped/tested for the 
specific pre-compiled kernels from the distro.

David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/