[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071024052931.GA22722@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:59:31 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rusty Russel <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
Richard Gooch <rgooch@...f.csiro.au>,
Tigran Aivazian <tigran@...azian.fs.co.uk>,
Shoahua Li <shaohua.li@...ux.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Refcount based Cpu Hotplug. V2
Hello everyone,
This is the version 2 of the refcount based cpu-hotplug "locking"
implementation.
It incorporates the review comments from the first posting which
can be found here --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/16/118.
Changes since v1:
- !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU part is now handled correctly, thanks
to the patch from Paul Jackson.
- The cpu_hotplug_begin() uses a waitqueue instead of a completion struct
where a writer can wait while there are active readers in the system.
- Provided a new API's cpu_maps_update_begin(), cpu_maps_update_done()
for serializing the updates to cpu_present_map and cpu_online_map.
Thus threads which update the cpu_present_map should now call
cpu_maps_update_begin instead of lock_cpu_hotplug(), since they play the
role of writers.
- pseries_processor_add() , pseries_processor_remove() now use
cpu_maps_update_begin()/cpu_maps_update_done() in place of
lock_cpu_hotplug()/unlock_cpu_hotplug().
- Replaced the workqueue_mutex with workqueue_lock, which is a spinlock
and guards the workqueues list.
- Updated Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt to reflect get_online_cpus(),
put_online_cpus() in place of the old lock_cpu_hotplug(),
unlock_cpu_hotplug().
I'm Cc'ing the different subsystem maintainers who might be affected
by the changes in the patchstack. Especially if they rely on
lock_cpu_hotplug() to provide them protection for their local data
structures as well.
The patchstack which is based against 2.6.23-mm1 has behaved well
when it was stress tested with kernbench running while continuously
performing cpu-hotplug operations on i386, x86_64 and ppc64.
Awaiting your feedback.
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
--
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists