linux-kernel - libata PATA status for VIA 8237

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071024095602.GA2607@DervishD>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:56:02 +0200
From:	DervishD <lkml@...vishd.net>
To:	Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: libata PATA status for VIA 8237

    Hi all :)

I'm thinking about switching fully to libata in the near future
(currently I'm using CONFIG_IDE for all my PATA drives, both hard disks
and DVD recorder), and I was wondering if PATA support for VIA8237 was
full or not. For what I've googled, it seems that it is usable both for
PATA and for SATA, but I want to be sure.

If I'm asking here is because I have SATA support for my VIA chipset
enabled in the kernel (CONFIG_SATA_VIA), but I'm getting these messages:

    sata_via 0000:00:0c.0: version 2.0
    sata_via 0000:00:0c.0: routed to hard irq line 10
    ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFE00 ctl 0xFE0A bmdma 0xFA00 irq 10
    ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xFD00 ctl 0xFD0A bmdma 0xFA08 irq 10
    scsi0 : sata_via
    ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
>>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xFE07
    scsi1 : sata_via
    ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
>>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xFD07
    sata_via 0000:00:0f.0: routed to hard irq line 11
    ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF900 ctl 0xF802 bmdma 0xF500 irq 11
    ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF700 ctl 0xF602 bmdma 0xF508 irq 11
    scsi2 : sata_via
    ata3: SATA link down 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xF907
    scsi3 : sata_via
    ata4: SATA link down 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>  ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xF707

Since I don't have any SATA disk on my system, I haven't given any
importance to these messages, but now that I want to switch to libata,
I'm concerned. I don't understand the marked messages, and I don't know
if they have to do with CONFIG_IDE and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX being
enabled together with CONFIG_SATA_VIA.

My kernel is 2.6.20.18 and my mobo has three PATA busses and four SATA
ports (which I think they are ata1-ata4 in the messages above. I don't
know why only two of them are marked as 1.5Gbps, according to the mobo
manual, all four are 1.5Gbps).

Thanks a lot in advance and feel free to ask if you need more
information about hardware or software.

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen!
We are waiting for 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 +0000 ...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/