[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071024113909.GA6214@localhost.sw.ru>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:39:09 +0400
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...ru>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, akpm@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bogus KERN_ALERT on oops
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:33:18PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
>
> > > - printk(KERN_ALERT "*pde = %016Lx ", page);
> > > + printk("*pde = %016Lx ", page);
> >
> > Use the new KERN_CONT annotation here?
>
> indeed - i changed the patch to do that.
Might as well change comment around KERN_CONT -- for starters it lied
about "early bootup" phase since day one.
Proposed text:
/*
* Annotation for a "continued" line of log printout (only done
* after a line that had no enclosing \n).
*
* Introduced because checkpatch.pl couldn't be arsed to learn C
* and distinguish continued printk() from the one that starts
* new line.
*
* Caveat #1: Empty string-literal, so compiler can't check for
* KERN_CONT misuse.
* Caveat #2: Empty string-literal, so it can't be used in
* printk(var); situations.
* Caveat #3: takes characters on the screen, so code is harder
* to read.
* Caveat #4: checkpatch.pl doesn't know C, so it can't check
* for KERN_CONT misuse, anyway.
*/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists