linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071024133804.GB14671@kernel.dk>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:38:04 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>,
	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout

On Wed, Oct 24 2007, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > sg_set_buf() also sets length and offset, sg_set_page() is just a mirror
> > of that. So I'd prefer to keep the naming.
> 
> Hmmm, sg_set_phys/sg_set_virt to be more symmetrical to
> sg_phys/sg_virt?

(please don't drop cc lists)

That doesn't make any sense. Both sg_set_buf() and sg_set_page() set the
same thing in the sg entry, the input is just different. It has nothing
to do with setting the physical value, for instance.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/