[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071024142811.GD14671@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:28:11 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@...elEye.com, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 09/11] call blk_queue_segment_boundary in __scsi_alloc_queue
On Wed, Oct 24 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:39:16 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
>
> > FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > request_queue and device struct must have the same value of a segment
> > > size limit. This patch adds blk_queue_segment_boundary in
> > > __scsi_alloc_queue so LLDs don't need to call both
> > > blk_queue_segment_boundary and set_dma_max_seg_size. A LLD can change
> > > the default value (64KB) can call device_dma_parameters accessors like
> > > pci_set_dma_max_seg_size when allocating scsi_host.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 3 +++
> > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > > index 61fdaf0..23a30ab 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > > @@ -1645,6 +1645,7 @@ struct request_queue *__scsi_alloc_queue(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
> > > request_fn_proc *request_fn)
> > > {
> > > struct request_queue *q;
> > > + struct device *dev = shost->shost_gendev.parent;
> > >
> > > q = blk_init_queue(request_fn, NULL);
> > > if (!q)
> > > @@ -1673,6 +1674,8 @@ struct request_queue *__scsi_alloc_queue(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
> > > blk_queue_bounce_limit(q, scsi_calculate_bounce_limit(shost));
> > > blk_queue_segment_boundary(q, shost->dma_boundary);
> > >
> > > + blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, dma_get_max_seg_size(dev));
> > > +
> >
> > it would be nice to have something more general that's useable in
> > drivers/block/sx8.c (for example), something like
> >
> > static inline void
> > dev_blk_associate(struct device *dev, request_queue *q)
> > {
> > blk_queue_max_segment_size(q,
> > dma_get_max_seg_size(dev));
> > }
> >
> > still, I will ACK the above patch (#9) in case you wish that to become a
> > future cleanup, or others dislike this suggestion
>
> Yeah, I thought about something like that. But I can't find many
> non-scsi drivers (ide, sx8, mmc/card/, anymore?) doing dma and having
> the restrictions so I just call blk_queue_max_segment_size here.
>
> Either is ok with me. I'll modify the patch if Jens prefers such
> function. Jens?
If there's a use for it, sure.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists