linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <471F72AD.8030902@ct.jp.nec.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:28:29 -0700
From:	Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
To:	vgoyal@...ibm.com
Cc:	Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>, hbabu@...ibm.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c

Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:18:27PM -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c.
>> There are three patches;
>> 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64
>> 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64
>> 3. unify crash_32/64.c
>>
>> I'm not sure that it's good to split to these patches.
>>
>> I've compiled on both of 32bit and 64bit, and tested
>> kdump on 64bit.
>>
> 
> Hi Hiroshi,
> 
> Thanks for the patches. Can you please also test it on 32bit to make
> sure nothing is broken.

Okay, I'll test it on 32bit.
A build problem already has been found on 32bit.

Thanks,
Hiroshi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/