linux-kernel - Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] nsp32_restart

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1193244072.3396.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:41:12 -0400
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	yokota@...lab.is.tsukuba.ac.jp, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] nsp32_restart_autoscsi(): remove error check

On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:25 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The Coverity checker noted that we'll anyway Oops later when we ran into 
> this condition - and the error check didn't prevent that.
> 
> Considering that the error condition shouldn't be possible, and we are 
> not able to handle it easily, this patch simply removes the pointless 
> error check.

This is the one where I said I don't like the fact that you're removing
the explanatory message that's printed before we crash.  if you want to
shut coverity up and stop sending the patch, I'm happy adding a BUG();
after the nsp32_msg().

James


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/