[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710242050540.17781@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:51:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@...oo.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Crispin Cowan <crispin@...spincowan.com>,
Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@...ian.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static
interface)
On Oct 24 2007 19:11, Simon Arlott wrote:
>
>* (I've got a list of access rules which are scanned in order until one of
>them matches, and an array of one bit for every port for per-port default
>allow/deny - although the latter could be removed.
>http://svn.lp0.eu/simon/portac/trunk/)
Besides the 'feature' of inhibiting port binding,
is not this task of blocking connections something for a firewall?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists