linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] stringbuf: A string buffer implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071023194527.4ac1dc85.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:45:27 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] stringbuf: A string buffer implementation

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:30:35 -0600 Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:

> It's a matter of taste ... some people prefer to use accessors for
> everything, other people prefer to expose the underlying structure
> directly.

Experience tells us that when you use accessors you end up thanking
yourself later on.  Especially when diddling struct page ;)

Although one really should make a best-effort guess at "how likely is
this to change in the future".  If the implementation-to-be-copied
has been out there for a while then "not very" is a good answer.

But hey, don't listen to me - I like C++, and approve of Java.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/