linux-kernel - Re: kernel processes - are they really needed?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:43:07 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Ram <vshrirama@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel processes - are they really needed?

Ram <vshrirama@...il.com> writes:

> Hi,
>     When i do ps -l. i see the following processes which are obviously
> started by kernel.
>
>    Could any one tell me what each of these processes do 

> and can anyone of them can be removed.?

Some of them can probably. Or rather many depending on the configuration.

Sometimes there are good reasons for an own thread, but often there are also 
bad reasons.

If the threads don't sleep or have special requirements long they
should generally just use keventd instead.

Unfortunately a lot of people seem to think they're cheap because 
it's relatively easy to create them using work queues now, so we end
up with more and more all the time.

Especially on systems with many cores or threads which end up with a
lot of dubious per CPU threads. Some scaling up is needed, but one per CPU 
seems to be generally too many.

My favourite for a ridiculous thread was and is "kpsmoused" 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/