lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <471FB260.8090503@hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:00:16 -0400
From:	Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
To:	David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] unexport icmpmsg_statistics

David Stevens wrote:
> My bad -- I see what it's doing, and it looks ok after all.
> 
> I thought I saw an INMSGS (but didn't).  These are ICMP errors that
> went through icmp_rcv() and were counted correctly before getting
> to the protocol error handlers. These are failures due mostly to not
> having enough, or the right protocol info in the error packet being
> handled. I'm not sure I'd count those as ICMP errors, since the
> ICMP header itself is correct, but ok...
> 
> SCTP doesn't look so bad, though I think the references are
> still questionable (but debatable) as ICMP errors.
> 
> sctp_v4_err is incrementing ICMP_MIB_INERRORS if there
> isn't enough IP header to find the ports, I see. I'm not sure
> that counts as an ICMP error, but it's not so terrible.
> 
> It's doing the same thing if a lookup fails to match "vtag" from
> the encapsulated error packet. Again, I don't know that those
> are ICMP errors (which normally are something wrong with
> the ICMP header).

This particular case is the one that bugs the most, but that
error matches best.

Seems like all ULPs treat socket lookup error as ICMP_MIB_INERRORS
(tcp, udp, sctp, dccp).

SCTP is a little special in that in needs to check one one piece
of data (the 'vtag') to correctly identify the connection.
If that piece doesn't match, we treat that as the same error.

-vlad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ