lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:25:17 -0400
From:	"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
To:	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] dm: noflush resizing (0/3)

Hi,

Currently, there is a restriction on resizing device-mapper device:
it cannot be resized if 'noflush' option is given for suspend.

Since both multipath-tools (dm-multipath) and LVM2 mirror use
'noflush' suspend, the restriction limits the capability of
those tools.

The following patches remove the restriction.
  [PATCH] (1/3) Add bdlookup()
  [PATCH] (2/3) Use bdlookup() on noflush suspend
  [PATCH] (3/3) Allow resizing table load on noflush suspend

The patches were tested on i686 and ia64 with LVM2,
for both 'noflush' case and normal case.

Background:

  - For some device-mapper targets (multipath and mirror),
    the mapping table sometimes has to be replaced to cope with device
    failure.
    OTOH, device-mapper flushes all pending I/Os upon table replacement
    and may result in I/O errors, if there are device failures.
    'noflush' suspend is used to let dm queue the pending I/Os
    instead of flushing them.
    Since it's not possible for user space program to tell whether
    the suspend could cause I/O error, they always use
    'noflush' to suspend mirror/multipath targets.

  - Currently resizing is disabled for 'noflush' suspend.
    Resizing occurs in the course of table replacement.
    To resize the device under use, device-mapper needs to get its
    bdev inode. However, using bdget() in this case could cause deadlock
    by waiting for I_LOCK where an I/O process holding I_LOCK is
    waiting for completion of table replacement.

Thanks,
-- 
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation of America
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ