[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020710250024q683cfff2ubd1f8bda75415e2c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:24:22 +0300
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Hugh Dickins" <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, ezk@...sunysb.edu,
ryan@...nie.org, mhalcrow@...ibm.com, cjwatson@...ntu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH+comment] fix tmpfs BUG and AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE
Hi Hugh,
On 10/25/07, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com> wrote:
> With unionfs also fixed, we don't know of an absolute need for this
> patch (and so, on that basis, the !wbc->for_reclaim case could indeed
> be removed very soon); but as I see it, the unionfs case has shown
> that it's time to future-proof this code against whatever stacking
> filesystems come along.
Heh, what can I say, after several readings, I still find your above
explanation (which I totally agree with) more to the point than the
actual comment :-).
In any case, the patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists