[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1193319816.6167.45.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:43:36 +0100
From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
Sergey Smirnov <svs1957@...il.com>
Cc: Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9217] New: CONFIG_CMDLINE doesn't pass to
kernel
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 14:23 +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:35:33PM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
>
> > >Something broke CONFIG_CMDLINE of ARM (at least) between 2.6.22 and 2.6.23.
> > >
> > >I don't know whether it was an ARM patch one of those kernel-wide changes.
> > >We have futzed with the command-line parsing a bit recently, but the 2.6.23
> > >changelog doesn't suggest anything obvious.
> >
> > What does the affected system's bootloader pass in r2? If it's nonzero,
> > ARM's 2.6.23 may interpret it as being an ATAGS pointer. And when that
> > happens, the system prefers the ATAGS over CONFIG_CMDLINE.
> >
> > There's sanity checking in __vet_atags, but maybe it isn't enough.
> > Other than that, I can't see anything yet.
>
> If this is the SHARP Shepherd (which seems to be the Zaurus SL-C750,
> which looks like it's the one the submitter is using), it's not setting
> boot_params at all:
>
> MACHINE_START(SHEPHERD, "SHARP Shepherd")
> .phys_io = 0x40000000,
> .io_pg_offst = (io_p2v(0x40000000) >> 18) & 0xfffc,
> .fixup = fixup_corgi,
> .map_io = pxa_map_io,
> .init_irq = pxa25x_init_irq,
> .init_machine = corgi_init,
> .timer = &pxa_timer,
> MACHINE_END
The Zaurus has an insane bootloader which doesn't pass any sane values,
it doesn't support the right (well, any) machine number and the
commandline it passes is unchangeable and bogus too. The approach has
always therefore been to pretend it doesn't exist and used a commandline
compiled into the kernel.
Could the original bug reporter please report what commandline the
kernel actually uses please? In theory it can only be either:
* the one being compiled in with CONFIG_CMDLINE
* the one hardcoded into the bootloader
but I'd be surprised it boots at all with the latter!
Cheers,
Richard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists