linux-kernel - Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] Export acpi_check_resource

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:13:47 +0200
From:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
To:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] Export acpi_check_resource_conflict]

On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 15:48 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:53:47 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:33:07 +0200 Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
> > > To: linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
> > > Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
> > > Reply-To: trenn@...e.de
> > > Subject: [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] Export acpi_check_resource_conflict]
> > > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:33:07 +0200
> > > Organization: Novell/SUSE
> > > X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 
> > > 
> > > Export acpi_check_resource_conflict(), sometimes drivers already have
> > > a struct resource at hand so no need to use the wrappers to build a new
> > > one.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
> > > ---
> > 
> > The attributions on this are all mucked up.
> > 
> > I _think_ it was written by Jean, in which case the changlog should
> > have had From:him right at the start to indicate this.  And as you
> > were in the delivery path, it should have had your signoff.
> > 
> > I'll make those changes - please let me know if I misguessed.
> 
> You are correct, patches 3/5, 4/5 and 5/5 of this patchset were written
> by me (as in: I'm the one to blame if something breaks). I expected
> Thomas to add a From: header and add his own Signed-off-by line but
> instead he forwarded my mails directly. Thanks for fixing up the mess,
> we'll try to make it better next time.

As said, I wasn't sure against what I should base all this.
I would had cleaned it up, depending on what you told me. I also didn't
know about the From: tag if you send patches not from your own, the next
time...
Anyways, it's nice to see how things can move on right away without much
delay and discussion.

Thanks,

   Thomas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/