linux-kernel - Re: Using -traditional in EXTRA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4720B383.40701@goop.org>
Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:17:23 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Using -traditional in EXTRA_AFLAGS

Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> Guys,
>
> is there any particular reason we're using -traditional in
> EXTRA_AFLAGS in Makefiles?
>   

What?  Where?  I thought I removed them all.  Or is this from the x86_64
tree?

> I'd suggest just removing it, but obviously, there might well be
> people with good reasons for it to stay (The same effect of token
> pasting can be achieved in some ways, so if -traditional stays, that's
> not the greatest problem in the world... just that token pasting in
> asm files will diverge from the way in which we (-)traditionally do
> ;-) )
>
> So, does any one have a word on that?
>   


Kill -traditional where ever it may be.  You might need to fix up some
cruft in the process, but shouldn't be too hard.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/